Four Forest Restoration Initiative

Fire Reintroduction

Reintroduction of Fire to Forest Ecosystems

Adapted from: Cathy W. Dahms and Brian W. Geils, Technical Editors. 1997. An Assessment of Forest Ecosystem Health in the Southwest. General Technical Report RM-GTR-295. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Southwestern Region, Fort Collins, CO. This report is available in its entirety on the web at

Wildfires had an essential part of in the ecology of many of the Colorado Plateau's biotic communities prior to Euro-American settlement. Whether lightning-caused or started by native peoples, wildfires were once quite common occurences throughout the grasslands and forests of the region. These frequent fires maintained an open forest structure in the ponderosa pine forests, and prevented tree encroachment into high elevation meadows and grasslands.

A century of fire suppression and grazing in the Southwest has significantly decreased the incidence of low-intensity natural surface fires, while the number of catastrophic wildfires in the region's forests has increased dramatically, especially during recent drought conditions.

The Forest Service has recommended a significant increase in the use of prescribed fire in many of the region's forests. Prescribed fire is the intentional burning of forest fuels under conditions specified in an approved plan to meet management objectives and confined to a predetermined area; ignition may be either the result of a scheduled management activity or from other sources (e.g., lightning).

In most parts of the region and until very recently, prescribed fire has mostly been used to burn slash piles and for small broadcast burns, but the Forest Service believes that an increase in the number of acres of broadcast burning would enhance forest health. The potential benefits from broadcast burning are numerous and include–reduction in fuel loads; stimulation of understory vegetation including grasses, forbs, and shrubs; thinning of overcrowded stands; and nutrient cycling. Over time, prudent use of prescribed burning could reduce the damage caused by wildfire, as well as the costs associated with fire suppression (Moody  et al. 1992).

Thinning stands with fire can potentially be done at a much lower cost than with mechanical thinning, although past attempts to do this in the Southwest have met with varying degrees of success (Harrington and Sackett 1990). Generally, fire increases structural heterogeneity and diversity, creating mosaics within stands and over larger areas. It recycles nutrients for use by surviving trees and new vegetation. No other silvicultural technique fully mimics the ecological effects of historical fire regimes.

Burning tends to promote natural regeneration of ponderosa pine, providing favorable seedbeds and enhancing the growing environment for survival (Harrington and Sackett 1990). Repeated burning of the same area would be expected to maintain a sparse understory and relatively open forest conditions by killing some of the previously established regeneration.

A few studies indicate a tendency for understory burning to reduce stand dwarf mistletoe infection levels (Harrington and Hawksworth 1990); significant amounts of crown scorch are probably needed to achieve this effect.

Like other management practices, prescribed burning is both an art and a science. Every prescribed burn can be a learning tool; the acquired experience of practitioners is invaluable. Documentation and monitoring of prescribed burning activities and their effects is also be crucial for developing and improving burning programs.


Latest News

April 2, Preview of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Four Forest Restoration Initiative
Read the Press Release